Wrong strandedness
Library prep and counting settings disagree, and a large share of reads land on the wrong strand. The volcano plot still looks fine.
Check: inferred vs declared strandCodeISB runs your bulk RNA-seq analysis and audits it as it goes: swapped samples, the wrong strandedness setting, batch tangled with condition. You get the figures plus a report your reviewer can verify.
No payment today. Founding labs get access first and keep their launch price for 12 months.
Library prep and counting settings disagree, and a large share of reads land on the wrong strand. The volcano plot still looks fine.
Check: inferred vs declared strandTwo tubes trade names somewhere between the bench and the sample sheet. Differential expression runs without complaint.
Check: sex-linked and marker-gene identityEvery treated sample was sequenced on the same lane. The model fits, and the result may be the lane rather than the treatment.
Check: design matrix and batch overlapA reviewer, a collaborator, or you in two years cannot see any of this from a figure. CodeISB runs the checks every time and puts the outcome next to the result.
Your count matrix and sample sheet. Name the comparison you care about.
Normalization, differential expression and pathway analysis run on a pinned, versioned pipeline.
Each check returns pass, warn or fail with the evidence. Fixable problems are fixed and logged.
Figures, tables and the audit report, plus a run record that reproduces the analysis.
One dataset, one comparison set, one audit report. For a first paper or a one-off.
For a lab with regular sequencing. Up to 6 projects each month, shared across your team.
For a sequencing core or a group that delivers data to many labs.
Founding prices apply for 12 months from your first project. Reserving a spot does not charge you or commit you to buy.
We are opening access to a small group of founding labs first. Your answers decide what gets built first, so be specific.
No. It automates the routine analysis and the checks that people skip under deadline. A bioinformatician still decides the design, the contrasts and what the results mean.
A count matrix and a sample sheet. The form above asks what you start from so we can decide whether to add FASTQ processing first.
The report says what failed and shows the evidence. If the fix is mechanical, such as a strandedness setting, we apply it and log the change. If it needs a decision from you, the run stops and tells you why.
Human and mouse first. Tell us what you work on in the form and it will shape the order after that.
Founding labs are invited in small groups as the tool is ready. We will email you with a date and a free first run on your own data.